The Cult of Doing.

Aug 21
Being Versus Doing · Part One of Two.

The Cult of Doing.

Walk into any real estate training room and count the words. Script. System. Funnel. Follow-up sequence. Touch point. KPI. Now count how many times someone in the room is asked who they are. Almost never — because the answer might be more than the coach at the front knows what to do with. Safer to hand out expertise and let identity shrink to fit.

The industry has built an entire economy on doing. What to say when the seller hesitates. How to structure the database. When to call, text, door-knock, mail. Why the thirty-third touch supposedly converts where the thirty-second didn't. All of it useful. None of it about the person doing it.
The coaching solution to consumer distrust has always been competence. Teach agents to be better at the doing, the theory goes, and consumers will reward the best with their business. It's a tidy bet. It's also the bet that built the commodity perception it was supposed to cure, because competence is precisely the thing that can be copied, scaled, and undercut. Train a thousand agents on the same script and you haven't created a thousand best agents. You've created one script with a thousand faces.

Competence can be copied. Character can't.

This is where the dependency model shows its hand. Coaches like Tom Ferry, Tom Panos, and Ricky Carruth sell ongoing access to a framework — the next script, the next system, the next thing to do differently this quarter. The business model requires that agents keep needing it. A framework that made itself redundant would be bad for recurring revenue. So the doing never stops, because it was never designed to.

Underneath it all sits an assumption nobody examines: that agents already possess enough self-awareness that character doesn't need coaching. Being is treated as private, finished, none of the industry's business. Just point the magnifying glass at process and leave the person alone.

That assumption has a cost. Where being goes unexamined, the agents with the lowest standards operate exactly as freely as the ones with the highest. Nothing in the system distinguishes them, because the system was never built to look. They drag the average down, and the average is what the public meets. Reputation isn't damaged by bad actors alone. It's damaged by an industry that never built anything capable of telling a bad actor from a good one.

So consumers do the only thing left available to them. They stop looking for the agent and start comparing the product. Fee, marketing package, sign-on-the-lawn. Commodity thinking isn't something that happened to real estate. It's what happens to any market that spends all its energy on doing and none on being.

Competence is what you do. Being is who you are while you do it. 

Part Two is about the second one — and why it's far less complicated than the industry has made it out to be.

Trust — wanna buy some?
Created with